The report of the Army Inspector General (DAIG) follows up on the Taguba report that made findings against BG Karpinski. The DAIG investigations gave Karpinski a chance to review and rebut the report. The DAIG then gave Major Taguba a chance to respond to that. Conclusions: allegation of improper dereliction of duty is substantiated; material misrepresentation to AR 15-6 investigation is unsubstantiated; failure to obey a lawful order is unsubstantiated. Includes appendixes, including Karpinski's response, Army regulations.